<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Undertaking sewers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/financial/undertaking-sewers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/financial/undertaking-sewers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 13:19:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren Ball</title>
		<link>http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/financial/undertaking-sewers/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/?p=342#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I’m such an incorrigible nerd sometimes but...

The definitions are to be found in BS 6100 which defines “sewerage” thus: A network of pipes or channels to convey foul sewage and /or storm water from a developed area.

None of this justifies the existence of the word “sewerage” however when we have the simpler word “sewers”, which means precisely the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m such an incorrigible nerd sometimes but&#8230;</p>
<p>The definitions are to be found in BS 6100 which defines “sewerage” thus: A network of pipes or channels to convey foul sewage and /or storm water from a developed area.</p>
<p>None of this justifies the existence of the word “sewerage” however when we have the simpler word “sewers”, which means precisely the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynneguist</title>
		<link>http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/financial/undertaking-sewers/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>lynneguist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thedanglingmodifier.co.uk/?p=342#comment-117</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth, I say &#039;sewage&#039; and would have regarded it as a speech error if I&#039;d heard anyone say &#039;sewerage&#039;.  But I don&#039;t know many people who talk about the pipes.

&#039;Undertaker&#039; originally just meant anyone who undertakes a job for anyone else.  Among the funeral profession (in the US), the word is frowned upon.  I&#039;m quite happy to see someone reclaiming it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I say &#8217;sewage&#8217; and would have regarded it as a speech error if I&#8217;d heard anyone say &#8217;sewerage&#8217;.  But I don&#8217;t know many people who talk about the pipes.</p>
<p>&#8216;Undertaker&#8217; originally just meant anyone who undertakes a job for anyone else.  Among the funeral profession (in the US), the word is frowned upon.  I&#8217;m quite happy to see someone reclaiming it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

